
Over the weekend I read “Why We’re Not Emergent,” by Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck. I highly recommend it to you. The book is an excellent primer on the emergent church and the theology of such emergent bigwigs as Brian McLaren, Doug Pagitt, Rob Bell, Leonard Sweet, Donald Miller, Peter Rollins and others.
I won’t give an in-depth review, and instead point you to Tim Challies’ review of the book. I will provide a few quotes from the book that I found to be especially insightful and interesting.
On emergents’ views about God speaking:
The emergent agnosticism about truly knowing and understanding anything about God seems to be pious humility. It seems to honor God’s immensity, but it actually undercuts His sovereign power. Postmoderns harbor such distrust for language and disbelieve God’s ability to communicate truth to human minds that they effectively engage in what Carson calls “the gagging of God.” For example, Tomlinson writes, “To say Scripture is the word of God is to employ a metaphor. God cannot be thought of as literally speaking words, since they are an entirely human phenomenon that could never prove adequate as a medium for the speech of an infinite God.” In a similar vein, Bell writes, “Our words aren’t absolutes. Only God is an absolute, and God has no intention of sharing this absoluteness with anything, especially words people have come up to talk about him.”
Such statements fly in the face of redemptive history and nearly every page of Scripture. The God of the Bible is nothing if He is not a God who speaks to His people. To be sure, none of us ever infinitely understand God in a nice, neat package of affirmations and denials, but we can know Him truly, both personally and propositionally. God can speak. He can use human language to communicate truth about Himself that is accurate and knowable, without ceasing to be God because we’ve somehow got Him all figured out.
On emergents’ emphasis on right living instead of right doctrine:
Besides being untrue, orthodoxy as orthopraxy is monumentally unhelpful. It sounds wonderful at first. Jesus is the best way to live. Where’s the harm in that? After all, it is true that Jesus taught good ethics and set a good moral example. But if orthodoxy means I live the right way, the way of Jesus, I have no hope. Where do I turn after I’ve screwed up the beatitudes for the fiftieth time? Where do I find peace when I realize I fail the Sermon on the Mount daily? …
Now, I’m sure many in the emergent church would also talk about grace, but I don’t read much about grace in their books. Certainly, there’s grace as a general inclusiveness, but not grace as the only hope for sinners deserving of God’s judgment. I despair when I hear Pagitt say, “The good news is not informational … Instead we have an invitation into a way of life — life we constantly realize is not ours alone.” If the good news is an invitation to a Jesus way of life and not information about somebody who accomplished something on my behalf, I’m sunk. This is law and no gospel.
On emergents and liberalism:
The biggest irony about the emergent church may just be this: For all their chastisement of all things modern, they are in most ways thoroughly modern. Many of the leading books display a familiar combination of social gospel liberalism, a neoorthodox view of Scripture, and a post-Enlightenment disdain for hell, the wrath of God, propositional revelation, propitiation, and anything more than a vague, moralistic, warmhearted, adoctrinal Christianity.
On emergents and politics:
American Christianity has at times sounded a lot like the platform of the GOP. Emergent leaders need to be careful they do not make the same mistake in the opposite direction. Emergent Christians shouldn’t position themselves as the neutral middle ground when their concerns read like talking points of the Democratic National Committee: racism, environmental degradation, militarism, corporate greed, poverty, Third World debt, overpopulation, consumerism, AIDS, and imperialism. …
The emergent church, like Protestant liberalism before it, is quite certain about God’s politics yet equally uncertain about God’s theology.
This book is well worth your time, and will help you understand a movement which is a cause for concern, because it too often abandons the gospel entirely.